A wealth of evidence points to the positive effects of nursing and human milk on one's health. It is determined that one of the essential things that can be done for public health and the environment is to encourage and support longer breastfeeding sessions. The initiative known as Healthy People (2010) has as its primary objectives the enhancement of both the richness and longevity of life and the elimination of existing medical inequities in our community. Lactation has indeed been recognised as among the targets that must be accomplished in order to reach the Healthier Individuals 2010 agenda. Much information is available regarding the frequency of breastfeeding beginning and continuing for various kinds of women. Investigation on demographics has shown a significant variation between applications available on factors including age, family status, occupation, schooling, geographic area, employment history, ethnic group and length of time spent breastfeeding (Bai et al., 2010; Flower et al., 2008; Sparks, 2009). Several studies are underway on infants who were born prematurely, had a lower birth weight, had a limited capacity to suckle, or had other medical problems which might potentially interfere with suckling or the consumption or absorption of mother's milk (Cricco-Lizza, 2009; Spatz, 2006). In addition, studies have demonstrated the significance of healthcare professional training, prenatal hospitalization and medical processes, baby-friendly institution accreditation, mothers' access to breastfeeding resources and peer support (Rosenberg et al., 2008).
In contrast extreme, little is documented about just the challenges of nursing that are had by moms who have ongoing health disorders such as high blood pressure and diabetes. The goals of this study were to ascertain the conception and length of time percentages of lactation among women who were diagnosed with high blood pressure or insulin resistance; to investigate the discrepancies among asthma attacks, high blood pressure, and type 2 diabetes mothers in their attempts to feed; and also to discuss potential connections among predictors of nursing and the behavioural beliefs, subjective norm, and perceived behavioural control of women who had hypertension, or metabolic disorders. Several studies have postulated that even if mothers who experience these long-term illnesses choose to breastfeed expressing personal newborns, those offspring' healthcare might improve, in addition to a lower risk of those individuals developing the chronic conditions altogether (Horta et al., 2007; Kull, 2002).
Review of the LiteratureThe subsequent critical analysis of the relevant literature focused on the following points:
(a) the consequences of chronic disease on pregnancy, as well as its influence on a mother's desire to breastfeed or her attempts to do so,
(b) the influence of race/ethnicity and culture on breastfeeding
(c) Attempts to Help Mothers Breastfeed.
Chronic IllnessIt is common knowledge that the health advantages of nursing and human milk have been extensively researched and established. Enhancing the efficiency at which women in the United States breastfeed their children have already been designated as a critical public goal (People, 2010). Nonetheless, mothers who suffer from chronic ailments should overcome challenges that the general public cannot face to nurse their children. Over 108 million individuals in the United States live with such a chronic disease, and numerous individuals have more than a severe ailment. By the year 2030, it is anticipated that almost half of the united states population will be living with a chronic illness (WHO, 2002). According to the World Health Organization (WHO), a chronic illness must be "continuously managed over several years or generations". Care that is prompt, effective, and sympathetic is necessary for patients who suffer from long-term illnesses (Cumbie et al., 2004). In many cases, people are more inclined to participate in healthy behaviours when they better understand the positive effects of such actions on their well-being and if they are considered active participants in healthcare insurance engagement (Hwu & Yu, 2006). In addition, more cases of chronic disease are reported in women than in males, and an increased number of younger women are now being identified with one of these conditions (Ahluwalia et al., 2005).
Women who have a higher likelihood of developing a chronic condition also have a potentially higher likelihood of experiencing difficulties all through gestation, birth, and after that. Under this nation, 31 per cent of conceptions are regarded to be complex and fraught with hazards for both the child and her mother. The first prenatal visit must not occur very often until 11 or 12 weeks (Prevention, 2006). Women who suffer from chronic diseases such as high blood pressure or diabetes are more likely to have a preterm childbirth, a baby with such a birthweight, and other difficulties related to gestation. These women also have a more significant chance of requiring a caesarean (Linton & Peterson, 2004). These mothers could need far more medical assistance throughout a difficult gestation and delivery and might have to be taken from their infants if the latter requires emergency care. It has been shown that moms with a caesarean birth and newborns admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) have fewer nursing costs than mothers and infants. In the NICU, it is particularly crucial to have successful approaches encouraging mother-baby interaction and breastfeeding (Chalmers et al., 2010; Nyqvist et al., 2010). For example, Thomas (2004) did a post-birth qualitative data involving 15 women who had suffered a clinically difficult gestation to discover the different methods by which the women addressed or dealt with their medical issues following childbirth.
When a woman gives birth, it might be an unsatisfying experience for her. However, suppose she suffers from a severe condition. In that case, she must contend with considerable changes in her body, mental state, and community interactions as she tries to recover command of or regulate her situation. Schaefer (2004) conducted an experimental design involving nine nursing women diagnosed with fibromyalgia to investigate overall perspectives regarding nursing their children. Her research revealed that the most common challenges associated with nursing were aches and pains in the bones and tightness. Though tiredness never was recognised as an obstacle in women who did not suffer from a severe illness Callahan et al (2006), this was recognized as an interference with nursing for women who had fibromyalgia. Because of painful nipples, an apparent inadequate milk production, or the need for medicine, several mothers felt they had no choice but to discontinue nursing their children. Some parents had feelings of sadness and depression due to having to emancipate their child from breastfeeding earlier than expected. They also felt that they were unable to be the ideal parent. Enduring breathlessness and tightness, enhanced vomiting and nausea, sleep disturbances, a progression of intolerance, gastrointestinal reflux, tremors and palpitations, poor mobility, gestation hypertension, and diabetes mellitus were some of the significant symptoms.
Most women believed that improved medical attention, assistance, and teaching may have assisted individuals in guiding their health. The author stressed the significance of nursing in assisting patients in comprehending their conditions, ensuring that medications were taken as prescribed, and avoiding stressors that exacerbated their existing health problems. Some ladies could not comprehend the rationale behind their being required to remain at the medical facility to take their prescriptions and spend time at home. Although they had made efforts to reduce the high-stress levels, individuals frequently blamed distress for leading to hospitalisation. A number of the women expressed gratitude for their social networks' assistance while indicating their unhappiness with conflicting data about their health and time in the institution. Despite not being mentioned, this study highlighted the importance of knowledge about the dangers of pregnancy-related hypertension and the benefits of therapies such as hospitalisation and breastfeeding assistance. Levy-Shiff et al.(2002) researched 153 pregnant women with pregnancy-induced and gestational diabetes mellitus. They contrasted the psychological health of these moms to the psychological adjustment of non-diabetic women who were having a relatively safe pregnancy. The effects of a mother's medical history, her ability to cope, and the available resources to her were investigated in this research. Even though the women with these health conditions had a more significant amount of negative feelings and less pleasant emotions related to gestation, the women's overall health and resilience were not negatively impacted by having high-risk pregnancies in any way. The researchers argue that the duration of metabolism disruptions may be used to forecast the results for children. Researchers additionally highlighted that mothers' ability to cope and the conviction that their actions influenced their children's health encouraged more vital metabolic health. Both of these factors were important in the study.
Nevertheless, research conducted by Clausen et al.(2005) on diabetes's impact on motherhood in women with type 2 diabetes indicated that type 2 diabetic women had poorer birth outcomes when compared to the 37 women with type 1 diabetes and the general population. When compared to women who seemed to have type-1 diabetes, women who had type-2 diabetes had significantly higher rates of perinatal death as well as significantly higher morbidity rates. Therefore, it is critical to provide prenatal care to pregnant women carrying a child with a high risk of complications. The women reported trouble dealing with worries about physiological symptoms, resting, anxiety about a delivery, and difficulties with rest, exercising, and food. Some of the ladies had difficulty controlling overall illnesses and results and trying to keep up with their scheduled doctor's appointments. Additional issues that needed to be managed were elevated blood pressure, oedema, cough and respiration difficulties.
Racial/Ethnic and Cultural Impact on BreastfeedingHealth inequalities are still present in the United States for individuals from lower socioeconomic backgrounds, those from racial and ethnic minorities, and people from different traditions (Liao et al., 2004). The demographics above have a greater propensity to have higher rates of chronic disease and reduced rates of breastfeeding, especially exclusively breastfeeding Gibson-Davis & Brooks-Gunn (2006). According to the findings of research conducted by Dodgson et al. (2003) on the Ojibwe of Northern Minnesota, several traditional practices which encouraged nursing have been extinct. The ethnography research attempted to understand better the disparities that exist for such a population around nursing. Her research uncovered the significance of historical circumstances, Ojibwe tradition, medical, and nursing practises, all of which are important to nursing. Several Ojibwe women endured the trauma of being forcibly integrated into some other society, urbanisation, and obtaining medical treatment through non-native clinicians or practitioners who failed to have cultural awareness or compassion. This was their reality. Instead of encouraging nursing, the mothers developed ideas and habits that were more accepting of giving their children formula. Finally, the ladies discussed their feelings of isolation from individuals who might become role models or who might communicate the practices around nursing and the significance of mothers' milk, as well as breastfeeding and motherhood practises concerning health. Finally, the study's participants could recognise the many benefits of feeding and a willingness to reintroduce conventional nursing methods into contemporary baby dietary habits.
High blood pressure: Throughout pregnancy and breastfeeding, hypertension drugs must not be discontinued suddenly in the same way as a treatment for other medical illnesses that need pharmacological maintenance ought not to be interrupted. It has been shown that it is acceptable for nursing mothers to use several different antihypertensive drugs. It has been demonstrated that beta-blockers, such as oxprenolol, dilevalol, mepindolol, and propranolol, are safe for nursing moms to use (Beardmore et al., 2002). In addition, it was shown that calcium channel inhibitors, methyldopa, and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors are safe for use while breastfeeding despite having just a limited amount of transference into human milk. In certain instances, mothers diagnosed with moderate hypertension at stages 1 or 2 are instructed to stop taking their medicines, whereas those diagnosed at phase three are offered the minimum adequate amount (Gibson-Davis & Brooks-Gunn, 2006).
Diabetes: Insulin is considered to be the treatment of choice for hyperglycemia in pregnant women (McElduff et al., 2005). If the medicine is required during nursing, insulin is the treatment of choice; nonetheless, women must be monitored and vigilant for signs of hypoglycemia. There still is substantial debate regarding the safety of using oral antidiabetic medicine in pregnancy and breastfeeding due to the potential risks involved. Metformin and glyburide are two examples of oral hypoglycemic medicines that are usually considered safe for use (Hale, 2006). Therefore, all women must see their primary care physician before taking any drug, mainly herbal remedies.
Breastfeeding : Concerns and Suggestions Regarding Breastfeeding Women's choices to begin and maintain breastfeeding may be influenced by various parties, including healthcare professionals, organizations, professions, communities, and the public at large, especially in the light of applicable societal beliefs. Education and guidance from medical experts (such as doctors, midwives, midwives, and other healthcare providers) may be the two factors that have the most influence on a mother's choice to breastfeed their child (Belay et al., 2013; Wambach et al., 2005). It is frequently necessary for practitioners to also be informed regarding milk production and afterwards communicate that knowledge to women in a sustained and supportive way (Mantha et al., 2008; Rosen et al., 2008) are some of the cited studies. Cattanio (2008) highlighted the significance of disseminating information on the dangers of formula feeding to 44 individuals. He recommended that literature be provided to mothers to highlight the advantages of nursing and the dangers of using formula. Women should not feel so guilty if they cannot nurse their children. Heinig et al. (2009) cautioned against delivering information regarding the dangers of formula to women who believe they have no other option than to use it. They suggested that this knowledge be given with extreme care.
Institutional support. The institution's policies and practices have impacted the percentages of nursing mothers who start and continue the practice Benton-Davis et al.(2005). The maintenance, encouragement, and development of nursing must be ongoing. They should include all professionals to offer expectant parents education, assistance, and healthcare for themselves and their children who would be nursing. Treatments must start a significant amount of time before childbirth and extend until patients are released back into the neighbourhood. Support services, family assistance communities, informational and educational organisations, education and information organisations on a one-on-one basis, and one-on-one assistance and guidance should be targeted by initiatives, which should also consist of the following and practise (Ball, 2009; Godfrey & Lawrence, 2010). Institutional policies may impact whether or not a mother chooses to breastfeed her child exclusively (Declercq et al., 2009). In order to evaluate the nursing prevalence, Merewood et al. (2005) examined data collected through hospitals across the country that had been recognised as Baby Warm welcome. The Ten Steps to Successful Breastfeeding are used as recommendations for clinical procedures in baby-friendly institutions since this is one of the requirements for receiving the credentials.
Employer support: Women are entering the workforce at higher rates. More than two-thirds of such women are mothers to children younger than three years old. Around one-third of first-time moms return to work within the initial 12 weeks after giving birth, while the rest return in the next six months (Statistics, 2005). Work status does not negatively influence the rates of beginning nursing; nevertheless, employment history does have a detrimental effect on the rates of continuing nursing. Rojjanasrirat's (2004) descriptive research of the perceptions of 50 women returning to the workforce found that women who already had assistance, established plans for various circumstances, preserved a positive mindset, and reduced their pressure was able to keep supplying human milk for their babies. The study was conducted on women who had returned to work after having a baby. Women who worked in managerial, organizational, or technical capacities could nurse their children for far longer than those who worked in service or manufacturing capacities. Women who participated in the research conducted by Rojjanasrirat (2004) had high levels of education, were of middle income, generally Caucasian, and had access to appropriate breast pumps. Employers that give time to pump human milk, a place allowing security, and space to store milk showed a more significant percentage of mothers who breastfed their children. Those workers had more excellent morale, reduced sick days owing to sickness brought on by their babies, and reduced overall health care expenses for the children. A growing number of nations are passing laws that require businesses to make alternative arrangements for nursing moms. These facilities must be comfortable and confidential, have enough refrigeration, have the facilities to rinse apparatus and hands and allow time for the woman to nurse (Benton-Davis et al., 2005). In addition to the previously mentioned benefits, Slusser et al. (2004) discovered that using a double breast pump of high quality boosted optimum breast milk production and allowed for extended durations of nursing. According to their research findings, providing help out of employment helped two hundred eighty-three women who worked for the insurance industry feel less stressed, resulting in a rise in their milk production. There were 19,039 engaged Navy enlisted mothers and 3,051 officer women who coupled returning to work with nursing. It was observed that providing a suitable and private environment to nurses was significant to both groups of parents (Uriell et al., 2009). It was also highly crucial for moms with low incomes who had children who had been prematurely sick for them to have access to a good pump that would assist them in nursing (Chamberlain et al., 2006). Healthcare providers may facilitate women's returns to the workforce by providing them with pertinent details, preparatory counselling, and support, particularly by pointing them toward peer support (Angeletti, 2009).
Family Support: A mother's choice over whether or not to nurse may be significantly impacted by her immediate family, notably the mother's spouse, the father of the baby, or the grandma of the child (Hannan et al., 2005). The research conducted by Shaker et al. (2004) on the opinions of 129 parents towards newborn breastfeeding was used to assess whether or not a woman will nurse her child. Even though they knew that mother milk is better, each family in the research investigation had misunderstandings about breastfeeding regarding how convenient it is and how it should be performed in public. Creating a better knowledge of the preconception perspectives of parents might be helpful in the process of having nursing encouragement. Researchers Harner and McCarter-Spaulding (2004) discovered that a family's choice to nurse their child was influenced by the parents' connection and the father's age. According to Kathleen M. Kroland Tobias Grossmann (2018), the quality of the relationships of the 11.8 couples studied did not have a detrimental effect on the mother's ability to nurse their children at four months. In the research that was conducted by Harner and McCarter-Spaulding (2004), there were a total of 86 adolescents involved. Of these adolescents, 28 were coupled with an experienced companion and 59 were coupled with another adolescent. Compared to a spouse in adulthood of a different age, a companion at the same time of life as the teenagers were more likely to have a beneficial influence on the teenage parent's right to nurse her child. Great grandparents significantly affect the choice, mainly when there are no great nursing leaders to look up to. In a research of 601 moms who were encouraged by their grandparents to give their newborns alternative types of milk, Susin et al. (2005) showed that grandparents used to have a detrimental impact on the parents' choices towards nursing their children. The research placed a strong emphasis on treatments that increased learning among women as well as other members of the household. Sherriff et al. (2009) conducted a qualitative investigation of eight fathers to learn their perceptions of breastfeeding. The findings of this research showed that healthcare providers must recognize the involvement of parents in breastfeeding choices and start engaging parents through the treatment of women to increase the amount of time parents feed the baby their children.
Public support: The public's opinion of the difficulties associated with nursing might place additional demands on women who are nursing. The viewpoints of 2,369 adults from the United States who reacted to the Health styles 2000 questionnaire regarding one‘s preconceptions of breastfeeding discovered that 45% believed that breastfeeding hindered a family's style of life, 31% believed that newborns should indeed be nourished cereal by the age of 3 months. The same proportion started feeling that newborn babies should be nursed further than the age of one year. These findings were based on the respondents' conceptions of the benefits and drawbacks of breastfeeding. In addition, 27% of adults in the United States found public breastfeeding disappointing (Li et al., 2003).
SummaryThis literature review uses the terms "challenges" and "obstacles" interchangeably. Several of these conditions, such as hypertension and diabetes, might make it difficult for a woman to nurse. They also risk developing healthcare difficulties and delivering a baby to kids with congenital malformations, such as low weight, oversized for gestation, preterm delivery, hypoxia or hypoglycemia conditions, or significant for weeks of gestation. In this nation, 31 per cent of conceptions are regarded as complex and fraught with hazards for both the child and the mother. If women who suffer from these chronic health problems breastfed their children, their health and their children's health would significantly enhance, as well as a lower risk of these children developing the chronic diseases themselves if their mothers had breastfed them. An increased understanding of these family members' perceptions, perceptions, and behaviours toward breastfeeding may help health care professionals design and implement methods and initiatives for such mothers' organisations to obtain optimum breastfeeding consequences. These intervention strategies might assist such women's organisations in achieving maximum breastfeeding consequences.
ReferencesAhluwalia, I. B., Mack, K. A., & Mokdad, A. (2005). Report from the CDC. Changes in Selected Chronic Disease-Related Risks and Health Conditions for Nonpregnant Women 18–44 Years Old BRFSS. Journal of Women’s Health, 14(5), 382–386. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2005.14.382
Angeletti, M. A. (2009). Breastfeeding Mothers Returning to Work: Possibilities for Information, Anticipatory Guidance and Support from US Health Care Professionals. Journal of Human Lactation, 25(2), 226–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334408329482
Bai, Y., Middlestadt, S. E., Peng, C.-Y. J., & Fly, A. D. (2010). Predictors of Continuation of Exclusive Breastfeeding for the First Six Months of Life. Journal of Human Lactation, 26(1), 26–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334409350168
Ball, H. (2009). Supportive practices among hospital staff are strongly linked to chances of breast-feeding. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 41(3), 191–192. https://www.guttmacher.org/sites/default/files/article_files/4119109.pdf
Beardmore, K. S., Morris, J. M., & Gallery, E. D. M. (2002). Excretion of Antihypertensive Medication into Human Breast Milk: A Systematic Review. Hypertension in Pregnancy, 21(1), 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1081/PRG-120002912
Belay, B., Allen, J., Williams, N., Dooyema, C., & Foltz, J. (2013). Promoting Women’s Health in Hospitals: A Focus on Breastfeeding and Lactation Support for Employees and Patients. Journal of Women’s Health, 22(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2012.4040
Benton-Davis, S., Grummer-Strawn, L., Li, R., & Shealy, K. R. (2005). The CDC guide to breastfeeding interventions. https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/6648/cdc_6648_DS1.pdf
Callahan, S., Séjourné, N., & Denis, A. (2006). Fatigue and Breastfeeding: An Inevitable Partnership? Journal of Human Lactation, 22(2), 182–187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334406286972
Cattaneo, A. (2008). The benefits of breastfeeding or the harm of formula feeding? Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 44(1–2), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1754.2007.01263.x
Chalmers, B., Kaczorowski, J., Darling, E., Heaman, M., Fell, D. B., O’Brien, B., & Lee, L. (2010). Cesarean and Vaginal Birth in Canadian Women: A Comparison of Experiences. Birth, 37(1), 44–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536X.2009.00377.x
Chamberlain, L. B., McMahon, M., Philipp, B. L., & Merewood, A. (2006). Breast Pump Access in the Inner City: A Hospital-Based Initiative to Provide Breast Pumps for Low-income Women. Journal of Human Lactation, 22(1), 94–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334405284226
Clausen, T. D., Mathiesen, E., Ekbom, P., Hellmuth, E., Mandrup-Poulsen, T., & Damm, P. (2005). Poor Pregnancy Outcome in Women With Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Care, 28(2), 323–328. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.28.2.323
Cricco-Lizza, R. (2009). Rooting for the Breast. MCN: The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing, 34(6), 356–364. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NMC.0000363684.43186.fe
Cumbie, S. A., Conley, V. M., & Burman, M. E. (2004). Advanced practice nursing model for comprehensive care with chronic illness: model for promoting process engagement. ANS. Advances in Nursing Science, 27(1), 70–80. https://doi.org/10.1097/00012272-200401000-00008
Declercq, E., Labbok, M. H., Sakala, C., & O’Hara, M. (2009). Hospital Practices and Women’s Likelihood of Fulfilling Their Intention to Exclusively Breastfeed. American Journal of Public Health, 99(5), 929–935. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2008.135236
Dodgson, J. E., Henly, S. J., Duckett, L., & Tarrant, M. (2003). Theory of Planned Behavior-Based Models for Breastfeeding Duration Among Hong Kong Mothers. Nursing Research, 52(3), 148–158. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-200305000-00004
Flower, K. B., Willoughby, M., Cadigan, R. J., Perrin, E. M., & Randolph, G. (2008). Understanding Breastfeeding Initiation and Continuation in Rural Communities: A Combined Qualitative/Quantitative Approach. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 12(3), 402–414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-007-0248-6
Gibson-Davis, C. M., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2006). Couples’ Immigration Status and Ethnicity as Determinants of Breastfeeding. American Journal of Public Health, 96(4), 641–646. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2005.064840
Godfrey, J. R., & Lawrence, R. A. (2010). Toward Optimal Health: The Maternal Benefits of Breastfeeding. Journal of Women’s Health, 19(9), 1597–1602. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2010.2290
Hannan, A., Li, R., Benton-Davis, S., & Grummer-Strawn, L. (2005). Regional Variation in Public Opinion About Breastfeeding in the United States. Journal of Human Lactation, 21(3), 284–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334405278490
Harner, H. M., & McCarter-Spaulding, D. (2004). Teenage Mothers and Breastfeeding: Does Paternal Age Make a Difference? Journal of Human Lactation, 20(4), 404–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334404267120
Heinig, M. J., Ishii, K. D., Bañuelos, J. L., Campbell, E., O’Loughlin, C., & Vera Becerra, L. E. (2009). Sources and Acceptance of Infant-Feeding Advice Among Low-Income Women. Journal of Human Lactation, 25(2), 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334408329438
Horta, B., Bahl, R., Martines, J., & Victora, C. (2007). Evidence on the long-term effects of breastfeeding: systematic reviews and meta-analyses. World Health Organization, 1–52. https://www.dors.it/latte/docum/Breastfeeding and Maternal and Infant Health- review.pdf
Hwu, Y.-J., & Yu, C.-C. (2006). Exploring Health Behavior Determinants for People With Chronic Illness Using the Constructs of Planned Behavior Theory. Journal of Nursing Research, 14(4), 261–270. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.JNR.0000387585.27587.4e
Krol, K. M., & Grossmann, T. (2018). Psychological effects of breastfeeding on children and mothers. Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz, 61(8), 977–985. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-018-2769-0
Kull, I. (2002). Breast feeding and allergic diseases in infants--a prospective birth cohort study. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 87(6), 478–481. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.87.6.478
Levy-Shiff, R., Lerman, M., Har-Even, D., & Hod, M. (2002). Maternal adjustment and infant outcome in medically defined high-risk pregnancy. Developmental Psychology, 38(1), 93–103. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11806705
Li, R., Zhao, Z., Mokdad, A., Barker, L., & Grummer-Strawn, L. (2003). Prevalence of breastfeeding in the United States: the 2001 National Immunization Survey. Pediatrics, 111(5 Pt 2), 1198–1201. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12728138
Liao, Y., Tucker, P., Okoro, C. A., Giles, W. H., Mokdad, A. H., & Harris, V. B. (2004). Reach 2010 Surveillance for Health Status in Minority Communities---United States, 2001--2002. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. Surveillance Summaries (Washington, DC: 2002), 53(6), 1–36. https://europepmc.org/article/med/15329648
Linton, A., & Peterson, M. R. (2004). Effect of Preexisting Chronic Disease on Primary Cesarean Delivery Rates by Race for Births in U.S. Military Hospitals, 1999-2002. Birth, 31(3), 165–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0730-7659.2004.00301.x
Mantha, S., Davies, B., Moyer, A., & Crowe, K. (2008). Providing Responsive NURSING CARE to New Mothers With High and Low Confidence. MCN: The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing, 33(5), 307–314. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NMC.0000334899.14592.32
Merewood, A., Mehta, S. D., Chamberlain, L. B., Philipp, B. L., & Bauchner, H. (2005). Breastfeeding Rates in US Baby-Friendly Hospitals: Results of a National Survey. Pediatrics, 116(3), 628–634. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2004-1636
Nyqvist, K., Anderson, G., Bergman, N., Cattaneo, A., Charpak, N., Davanzo, R., Ewald, U., Ibe, O., Ludington-Hoe, S., Mendoza, S., Pallás-Allonso, C., Ruiz Peláez, J., Sizun, J., & Widström, A.-M. (2010). Towards universal Kangaroo Mother Care: recommendations and report from the First European conference and Seventh International Workshop on Kangaroo Mother Care. Acta Paediatrica, 99(6), 820–826. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2010.01787.x
People, H. (2010). Healthy People 2010 Final Review: Executive Summary. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/hpdata2010/hp2010_final_review_executive_summary.pdf
Prevention, C. for D. C. and. (2006). Why is preconception care a public health concern. US Department of Health and Human Services. Http://Www. Cdc. Gov/Ncbddd/Preconception/Whypreconception. Htm.(Accessed April 12, 2008). https://apps.who.int/iris/rest/bitstreams/912895/retrieve#:~:text=A growing body of evidence,pregnancy and child-health outcomes.
Rojjanasrirat, W. (2004). Working women’s breastfeeding experiences. MCN: The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing, 29(4), 222–227. https://journals.lww.com/mcnjournal/Fulltext/2004/07000/Working_Women_s_Breastfeeding_Experiences.4.aspx
Rosen, I. M., Krueger, M. V., Carney, L. M., & Graham, J. A. (2008). Prenatal Breastfeeding Education and Breastfeeding Outcomes. MCN: The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing, 33(5), 315–319. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NMC.0000334900.22215.ec
Rosenberg, K. D., Eastham, C. A., Kasehagen, L. J., & Sandoval, A. P. (2008). Marketing Infant Formula Through Hospitals: the Impact of Commercial Hospital Discharge Packs on Breastfeeding. American Journal of Public Health, 98(2), 290–295. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2006.103218
Schaefer, K. M. (2004). Breastfeeding in Chronic Illness. MCN, The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing, 29(4), 248–253. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005721-200407000-00010
Shaker, I., Scott, J. A., & Reid, M. (2004). Infant feeding attitudes of expectant parents: breastfeeding and formula feeding. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 45(3), 260–268. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02887.x
Sherriff, N., Hall, V., & Pickin, M. (2009). Fathers’ perspectives on breastfeeding: ideas for intervention. British Journal of Midwifery, 17(4), 223–227. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2009.17.4.41670
Slusser, W. M., Lange, L., Dickson, V., Hawkes, C., & Cohen, R. (2004). Breast Milk Expression in the Workplace: A Look at Frequency and Time. Journal of Human Lactation, 20(2), 164–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334404263731
Sparks, P. J. (2009). Rural-Urban Differences in Breastfeeding Initiation in the United States. Journal of Human Lactation, 26(2), 118–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334409352854
Spatz, D. L. (2006). State of the Science. The Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing, 20(1), 51–55. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005237-200601000-00017
Statistics, B. of L. (2005). Labor force statistics from the Current Population Survey. Bureau of Labor Statistics. https://www.marottaonmoney.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/A-1.-Employment-status-of-the-civilian-noninstitutional-population-16-years-and-over-prior-years-to-date.pdf
Susin, L. R. O., Giugliani, E. R. J., & Kummer, S. C. (2005). Influência das avós na prática do aleitamento materno. Revista de Saúde Pública, 39(2), 141–147. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102005000200001
Thomas, H. (2004). Women’s Postnatal Experience Following a Medically Complicated Pregnancy. Health Care for Women International, 25(1), 76–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399330490253256
Uriell, Z., Perry, A., Kee, A., & Burress, L. (2009). Breastfeeding in the Navy: Estimates of Rate, Duration, and Perceived Support1. Military Medicine, 174(3), 290–296. https://doi.org/10.7205/MILMED-D-03-8807
Wambach, K., Campbell, S. H., Gill, S. L., Dodgson, J. E., Abiona, T. C., & Heinig, M. J. (2005). Clinical lactation practice: 20 years of evidence. Journal of Human Lactation : Official Journal of International Lactation Consultant Association, 21(3), 245–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334405279001
WHO. (2002). Innovative Care for Chronic Conditions: Building Blocks for Action. Geneva: World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/42500/WHO_NMC_CCH_02.01.pdf?sequence=1
