Architecture Dissertation Topics

Architecture Dissertation Topics

Info: 949 words (1 pages) Architecture Dissertation Topics
Published: 20th May 2025 in Architecture Dissertation Topics

Share this:

Title: Understanding the Effects of a Predesign Transitionary Phase on Architectural Students' Creative Work

Research Gap:

The transitionary phase that sits between the architectural research and schematic design phase is often overlooked by curriculum developers and its contribution to student creativity and the development of concept has not been adequately researched with consideration of an outcomes-based environment.

Objectives:

  • To investigate whether the inclusion of a predesign transitionary phase would increase productivity of creativity,
  • To examine students’ change in design quality at the end of course before and after a predesign transitionary phase,
  • To examine the impact of the predesign transitionary phase on students’ conceptual depth and originality of their design outputs.
  • Methodology:

  • A mixed-methods approach including a pre/post experimental design studio with and without bridging phase,
  • Assessment will include creativity rubrics and peer/expert assessments,
  • Conducting group and focused interviews with students and tutors,
  • Students final project outputs will be reviewed with qualitative content analysis and visual metrics and exploration of the influence of a bridging phase to stimulate students’ creativity.
  • Theoretical Support:

  • Experiential Learning Theory (Kolb)
  • Design Thinking Frameworks
  • Zone of Proximal Development (Vygotsky)
  • Creative Process Models in Design Education
  • Key References:

  • Salama, A. M. (2015). Spatial Design Education: New Directions for Pedagogy in Architecture and Beyond. Ashgate.
  • Lawson, B. (2005). How Designers Think: The Design Process Demystified. Elsevier.
  • Schön, D. A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner. Basic Books.
  • 2. Title: Teaching Strategies for Enhancing Conceptual Design: A Study on Mind Mapping, Physical Modeling, and Sketching in the Predesign Bridging Phase

    Research Gap:

    Although various tools like mind mapping and modeling are used during the early design stages, there is limited comparative research on how these strategies affect the translation of research into design in the bridging phase.

    Objectives:

  • To examine the effectiveness of mind mapping, sketching, and modeling in concept development.
  • To compare student outcomes based on teaching tool preference and application.
  • To assess how these strategies improve clarity and coherence in concept formulation.
  • Methodology:

  • Action research in studio settings with controlled use of different teaching tools.
  • Surveys and reflective journals from students.
  • Analysis of process sketches, models, and final conceptual outputs.
  • Theoretical Support:

  • Multiple Intelligences Theory (Gardner)
  • Visual Thinking in Design Education
  • Constructivist Learning Theory
  • Embodied Cognition in Creative Learning
  • Key References:

  • Oxman, R. (1999). Educating the designerly thinker. Design Studies, 20(2), 105–122.
  • Goldschmidt, G. (2014). Linkography: Unfolding the Design Process. MIT Press.
  • Salama, A. M. (2016). Spatial Design Education. Routledge.
  • 3. Title: Assessment Methods in Architectural Education: The Role of Self-Critique and Peer Criticism in the Predesign Bridging Phase

    Research Gap:

    Conventional assessment in architectural studios emphasizes tutor critique; however, the formative role of self and peer critique in early phases is underexplored.

    Objectives:

  • To investigate how peer and self-assessment affect learning and creativity.
  • To evaluate their role in enhancing reflective thinking during predesign.
  • To examine correlations in terms of student satisfaction and quality of their outputs
  • Methodology:

  • Implement self and peer critique models in design studios.
  • Use rubrics to guide structured reflection.
  • Compare feedback cycles and final design clarity.
  • Theoretical Support:

  • Reflective Practice (Schön)
  • Social Constructivism (Vygotsky)
  • Assessment for Learning (AfL)
  • Studio Culture Narratives
  • Key References:

  • Nicol, D. (2010). The foundation of graduate attributes: Developing self-regulation through self and peer assessment. Studies in Higher Education.
  • Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the Reflective Practitioner. Jossey-Bass.
  • Blair, B. (2006). At the end of a huge crit in the summer. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education.
  • 4. Title: Bridging the Research-to-Design Gap: Curriculum Innovations for Integrating Transitional Phases in Architectural Studios

    Research Gap:

    There’s a gap between theory and applying design in studio education. Few programs formally address the research-to-design transition within their curriculum.

    Objectives:

  • To design a curricular module that bridges research and design.
  • To evaluate its impact on design coherence and depth.
  • To explore adaptability across institutions and teaching methods.
  • Methodology:

  • Curriculum prototyping and pilot testing in multiple design schools.
  • Pre/post evaluation of student work.
  • Faculty feedback and focus group discussions.
  • Theoretical Support:

  • Pedagogical Content Knowledge (Shulman)
  • Research-Based Design Education Models
  • Integrative Design Thinking
  • Curriculum Mapping and Innovation Frameworks
  • Key References:

  • Salama, A. M., & Wilkinson, N. (2007). Design Studio Pedagogy: Horizons for the Future.
  • Boyer, E., & Mitgang, L. (1996). Building Community: A New Future for Architecture Education.
  • Cuff, D. (1991). Architecture: The Story of Practice. MIT Press.
  • 5. Title: Cognitive Diversity and Learning Preferences in Architectural Design Education: Customizing Teaching Methods in the Predesign Bridging Phase

    Research Gap:

    Current pedagogical models often generalize teaching approaches, ignoring cognitive diversity and learner variability in design studios.

    Objectives:

  • To identify prevalent cognitive learning styles among architecture students.
  • To adapt bridging phase methods to accommodate learner differences.
  • To explore design outcomes under personalized teaching strategies.
  • Methodology:

  • Use learning style inventories (e.g., Kolb’s LSI, VARK).
  • Segmented learning interventions per student learning style.
  • Measure design innovation and student satisfaction across variants.
  • Theoretical Support:

  • Cognitive Load Theory
  • Experiential Learning Theory (Kolb)
  • Differentiated Instruction in Higher Education
  • Studio Pedagogy Frameworks
  • Key References:

  • Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Prentice Hall.
  • Felder, R., & Silverman, L. (1988). Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education.
  • DemirbaÅŸ, Ö. O., & Demirkan, H. (2007). Learning styles of design students and the relationship of academic performance and gender. Learning and Instruction.
  • 6. Title: The Influence of Transitional Pedagogies on Final Project Performance: A Correlational Study of Predesign Bridging Phase Interventions

    Research Gap:

    The direct link between transitional pedagogies and final project quality in architecture education has not been quantitatively established.

    Objectives:

  • To correlate structured bridging phase interventions with final project scores.
  • To measure student satisfaction and perceived learning outcomes.
  • To provide evidence-based recommendations for curriculum redesign.
  • Methodology:

  • Quasi-experimental, comparing control and intervention groups.
  • Performance rubric-based assessment, and student feedback forms.
  • Regression analysis and inferential statistics to assess impact.
  • Theoretical Support:

  • Outcome-Based Education (OBE)
  • Constructive Alignment (Biggs)
  • Learning Transfer Models
  • Studio-Based Learning Theory
  • Key References:

  • Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Open University Press.
  • Salama, A. M. (2015). Spatial Design Education. Routledge.
  • Dutton, T. A. (1987). Design and Studio Pedagogy. Journal of Architectural Education
  • Study Resources

    Free resources to assist you with your university studies!

    Research Gap:

    This will close in 0 seconds